Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arleigh_Burke-class_destroyer

The Arleigh Burke class of guided missile destroyers (DDGs) is the United States Navy‘s first class of destroyer built around the Aegis Combat System and the SPY-1D multifunction passive electronically scanned array radar. The class is named for Admiral Arleigh Burke, the most famous American destroyer officer of World War II, and later Chief of Naval Operations. The class leader, USS Arleigh Burke, was commissioned during Admiral Burke’s lifetime.

These warships were designed as multimission destroyers^[5] to fit the antiaircraft warfare (AAW) role with their powerful Aegis radar and surface-to-air missiles; antisubmarine warfare (ASW), with their towed sonar array, anti-submarine rockets, and ASW helicopter; antisurface warfare (ASuW) with their Harpoon missile launcher; and strategic land strike role with their Tomahawk missiles. With upgrades to their AN/SPY-1 phased radar systems and their associated missile payloads as part of the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System, the ships of this class have also begun to demonstrate some promise as mobile antiballistic missile and anti-satellite weaponry platforms. Some versions of the class no longer have the towed sonar, or Harpoon missile launcher. Their hull and superstructure were designed to have a reduced radar cross section.^[8]

The first ship of the class was commissioned on 4 July 1991. With the decommissioning of the last Spruance-class destroyer, USS Cushing, on 21 September 2005, the Arleigh Burke-class ships became the U.S. Navy’s only active destroyers; the class has the longest production run for any post-World War II U.S. Navy surface combatant.^[9] Besides the 62 vessels of this class (comprising 21 of Flight I, 7 of Flight II and 34 of Flight IIA) in service by 2016, up to a further 42 (of Flight III) have been envisioned.

With an overall length of 505 to 509 feet (154 to 155 m), displacement ranging from 8,315 to 9,200 tons, and weaponry including over 90 missiles, the Arleigh Burke class are larger and more heavily armed than most previous ships classified as guided missile cruisers.^[10]

Characteristics[edit]

The ships of the Arleigh Burke class are among the largest destroyers built in the United States. Only the Spruance, Kidd (563 feet (172 m)) and Zumwalt classes (600 feet (180 m)) were longer. The larger Ticonderoga-class ships were constructed on Spruance-class hull forms, but are designated as cruisers due to their radically different mission and weapons systems than the Spruance and Kidd-class destroyers. The Arleigh Burke class were designed with a new, large, water-plane area-hull form characterized by a wide flaring bow which significantly improves sea-keeping ability. The hull form is designed to permit high speed in high sea states.^[8]

The designers of Arleigh Burke incorporated lessons learned from the Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruisers, the latter which was deemed too expensive to continue building and too difficult to further upgrade. With the Arleigh Burke class, the U.S. Navy also returned to all-steel construction. An earlier generation had combined a steel hull with an innovative superstructure made of lighter aluminum to reduce top weight, but the lighter metal proved vulnerable to cracking. Aluminum is also less fire-resistant than steel;^[11] a 1975 fire aboard USS Belknap gutted her aluminum superstructure.^[12] Battle damage to Royal Navy ships exacerbated by their aluminum superstructures during the 1982 Falklands War supported the decision to use steel. Another lesson from the Falklands War^[13] led the navy to protect the ship’s vital spaces with double-spaced steel armor (creating a buffer for modern rockets) and kevlar spall liners.

The Arleigh Burke design incorporates stealth techniques, such as the angled rather than traditional vertical surfaces and the tripod mainmast,^[14][15] which make the ship more difficult to detect, in particular by antiship missiles. A Collective Protection System makes the Arleigh Burke class the first U.S. warships designed with an air-filtration system against nuclear, biological, and chemical warfare.^[16] Other NBC defenses include a “countermeasure wash down system”.^[17]

Their Aegis Combat System differs from a traditional rotating radar that mechanically rotates 360 degrees for each sweep scan of the airspace. Instead, Aegis uses a passive electronically scanned array, which allows continual tracking of targets simultaneous with area scans. The system’s computer control also allows centralization of the previously separate tracking and targeting functions. The system is also resistant to electronic countermeasures. Their stand-alone Harpoon antiship missile launchers give them an antiship capability with a range in excess of 64 nautical miles (119 km; 74 mi).^[8]

With the retirement of the Tomahawk antiship missile variant, only the Arleigh Burke-class ships before Flight IIA versions are well-equipped for antisurface warfare with Harpoon launchers. Others are not, but are loaded with SM-2 missiles in their vertical launch cells capable of an antiship mode, though they have limited range and damage potential.^[18]

“The 5-inch/54 caliber Mark 45 gun, in conjunction with the Mark 34 Gun Weapon System, is an antiship weapon which can also be used for close-in air contacts or to support forces ashore with Naval Gun-Fire Support (NGF), with a range of up to 20 miles (32 km) and capable of firing 20 rounds per minute.” The class’s RIM-7 Sea Sparrow/RIM-162 ESSM missiles provide point defense against missiles and aircraft while the Standard Missile SM-2 and SM-6 provide area antiaircraft defense; the SM-6 provides over-the-horizon missile defense.^[19][20] The Standard Missile 3 and 6 also provide Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD).^[20]

The ship has an electronics warfare suite that provides passive detection and decoy countermeasures.^[8] The class’s Light Airborne Multi-Purpose System (LAMPS) helicopter system improves the ship’s capabilities against submarines and surface ships, a helicopter able to serve as a platform to monitor submarines and surface ships, and launch torpedoes and missiles against them, as well as being able to support ground assaults with machine guns and Hellfire antiarmor guided missiles.^[21] The helicopters also serve in a utility role, able to perform ship replenishment, search and rescue, medical evacuation, communications relay, and naval gunfire spotting and controlling.

The Arleigh Burke class is a set of multimission ships with numerous combat systems, including a “combination of… an advanced antisubmarine warfare system (ASW), land attack cruise missiles, ship-to-ship missiles, and advanced antiaircraft missiles,”^[13] Burkes have the Navy’s latest antisubmarine combat system with active sonar, a towed sonar array, and antisubmarine rockets. They support strategic land strikes with their VLS launched Tomahawks.^[8] They are able to detect antiship mines at a range of about 1400 meters.^[22]

So vital has the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMD) role of the class become that all ships of the class are being updated with BMD capability.^[23] Burke production is being restarted in place of additional Zumwalt-class destroyers.^[24]

Development[edit]

In 1980, the U.S. Navy initiated design studies with seven contractors. By 1983 the number of competitors had been reduced to three: Bath Iron Works, Todd Shipyards, and Ingalls Shipbuilding.^[16] On 3 April 1985 Bath Iron Works received a US$321.9 million contract to build the first of class, USS Arleigh Burke.^[25] Gibbs & Cox was awarded the contract to be the lead ship design agent.^[26] The total cost of the first ship was put at US$1.1 billion, the other US$778 million being for the ship’s weapons systems.^[25] She was laid down by the Bath Iron Works at Bath, Maine, on 6 December 1988, and launched on 16 September 1989 by Mrs. Arleigh Burke. The Admiral himself was present at her commissioning ceremony on 4 July 1991, held on the waterfront in downtown Norfolk, Virginia.

The “Flight II Arleigh Burke” ships have the following improvement over the original Flight I: incorporation of combat direction finding, SLQ-32V-3, TADIX-B, JTIDS command and control processor, and the capability to launch and control SM-2 Block IV Extended Range Missile.^[27]

The “Flight IIA Arleigh Burke” ships have several new features, beginning with the USS Oscar Austin (DDG-79). Among the changes is the addition of two hangars for antisubmarine warfare (ASW) helicopters, and a new, longer Mark 45 Mod 4 5-inch/62-caliber naval gun (installed onto USS Winston S. Churchill (DDG-81) and later ships). Later Flight IIA ships starting with USS Mustin (DDG-89) have a modified funnel design that buries the funnels within the superstructure as a signature-reduction measure. TACTAS towed array sonar was omitted from Flight IIA ships and they also lack Harpoon missile launchers.^[28]

Ships from DDG-68 to DDG-84 have AN/SLQ-32 antennas that resemble V3 configuration similar to those deployed on Ticonderoga-class cruiser, while the remainder has V2 variants externally resembling those deployed on some Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigate. V3 has an active electronic countermeasures component while V2 is passive only. AN/SLQ-32 is being upgraded under the Surface Electronic Warfare Improvement Program (SEWIP), the first SEWIP Block 2 upgrades were installed in 2014 with full-rate production scheduled for mid-2015.^[28]

A number of Flight IIA ships were constructed without a Phalanx CIWS because of the planned Evolved Sea Sparrow Missile, but later the Navy decided to retrofit all IIA ships to carry at least one Phalanx CIWS by 2013.^[29] In March 2017, it was reported that the Navy plans to incorporate Seasaber Increment 1, a 60 kW-class laser weapon, into an unnamed Flight IIA destroyer by the fiscal year of 2020.^[30]

USS Pinckney, USS Momsen, USS Chung-Hoon, USS Nitze, USS James E. Williams and USS Bainbridge^[31] have superstructure differences to accommodate the Remote Mine-hunting System (RMS). Mk 32 torpedo tubes were moved to the missile deck from amidships as well.

Modernization[edit]

The U.S. Navy began a modernization program for the Arleigh Burke class aimed at improving the gun systems on the ships in an effort to address congressional concerns over the retirement of the Iowa-class battleships. This modernization was to include an extension of the range of the 5-inch (127 mm) guns on the flight I Arleigh Burke-class destroyers (USS Arleigh Burke to USS Ross) with extended range guided munitions (ERGMs) that would have given the guns a range of 40 nautical miles (74 km).^[32][33][34] However, the ERGM was cancelled in 2008.^[35]

The modernization program is designed to provide a comprehensive mid-life upgrade to ensure that the class remains effective. Reduced manning, increased mission effectiveness, and a reduced total cost including construction, maintenance, and operation are the goals of the modernization program. Modernization technologies will be integrated during new construction of DDG-111 and 112, then retrofitted into DDG flight I and II ships during in-service overhaul periods.^[36] The first phase will update the hull, mechanical, and electrical systems while the second phase will introduce an open architecture computing environment (OACE). The result will be improved capability in both ballistic missile defense (BMD) and littoral combat.^[37][38] By 2018, all Arleigh Burke-class ships homeported in the Western Pacific will have upgraded ASW systems, including the new AN/SQR-20 Multifunction Towed Array.^[39]

The Navy is also upgrading the ships’ ability to process data. Beginning with USS Spruance, the Navy is installing an internet protocol (IP) based data backbone, which enhances the ship’s ability to handle video. Spruance is the first destroyer to be fitted with the Boeing Company‘s gigabit Ethernet data multiplex system (GEDMS).^[40]

In July 2010 BAE Systems announced that it had been awarded a contract to modernize 11 ships.^[41] In May 2014 Sam LaGrone reported that 21 of the 28 Flight I/II Arleigh Burke-class ships would not receive a mid-life upgrade that included electronics and Aegis Baseline 9 software for SM-6 compatibility, instead they would retain the basic BMD 3.6.1 software in a $170 million upgrade concentrating on mechanical systems and on some ships, their antisubmarine suite.^[42] Seven Flight I ships – DDG 51-53, 57, 61, 65, 69 – will get the full US$270m Baseline 9 upgrade.^[42] Deputy of surface warfare Dave McFarland said that this change was due to the budget cuts in the Budget Control Act of 2011.^[43]

In 2016, the Navy will begin the outfitting of 34 Flight IIA Arleigh Burke vessels with a hybrid-electric drive (HED) to lower fuel costs. While the four LM-2500 gas turbines of the Arleigh Burkes are most efficient at high speeds, an electric motor is to be attached to the main reduction gear to turn the drive shaft to propel the ship at speeds under 13 knots (24 km/h), such as during ballistic missile defense or maritime security operations. Use of the HED for half the time could extend time on station by 2.5 days before refueling. Two vessels are planned to be outfitted in 2016, with the rest upgraded at a rate of four per year.^[44]

Also in 2016, four destroyers patrolling with the U.S. 6th Fleet based in Naval Station Rota, Spain (USS Porter, USS Carney, USS Ross, USS Donald Cook) will get a self-protection upgrade by replacing a Phalanx CIWS with the SeaRAM, a close-range ship defense system that combines the Phalanx sensor dome with an 11-cell RAM launcher, the first time the system has been paired with an Aegis ship.^[45]

Production restarted and further development[edit]

The class was scheduled to be replaced by Zumwalt-class destroyers beginning in 2020,^[46] but an increasing threat from both long- and short-range missiles caused the Navy to restart production of the Arleigh Burke class and consider placing littoral combat mission modules on the new ships.^[47][48]

In April 2009 the Navy announced a plan that limited the Zumwalt class to three units while ordering another three Arleigh Burke-class ships from both Bath Iron Works and Ingalls Shipbuilding.^[24] In December 2009 Northrop Grumman received a $170.7 million letter contract for DDG-113 long-lead-time materials.^[49] Shipbuilding contracts for DDG-113 to DDG-115 were awarded in mid-2011 for US$679.6m–$783.6m;^[50] these do not include government-furnished equipment such as weapons and sensors which will take the average cost of the FY2011/12 ships to US$1,842.7m per vessel.^[1]

DDG-113 to DDG-115 will be “restart” ships, similar to previous Flight IIA ships, but including modernization features such as Open Architecture Computing Environment. DDG-116 to DDG-121 will be “Technology Insertion” ships with elements of Flight III.^[51] Flight III proper will begin with the third ship procured in 2016.^[52]

Flight III ships, construction starting in FY2016 in place of the canceled CG(X) program, have various design improvements including radar antennas of mid-diameter increased to 14 feet (4.3 m) from the previous 12 feet (3.7 m).^[53] These Air and Missile Defense Radars (AMDR) use digital beamforming, instead of the earlier passive electronically scanned array radars.^[54]

Costs for the Flight III ships increased rapidly as expectations and requirements for the program have grown. In particular, this was due to the changing requirements needed to carry the proposed Air and Missile Defense Radar system required for the ships’ ballistic missile defense role.^[55] The Government Accountability Office found that the design of the Flight IIIs was based on “a significantly reduced threat environment from other Navy analyses” and that the new ships would be “at best marginally effective”. The U.S. Navy disagrees with the GAO findings, claiming the DDG-51 hull is “absolutely” capable of fitting a large enough radar to meet requirements. Installation of the AMDR would require double the power and double the cooling, but there is room to fit what is needed inside the hull.^[56]

In spite of the production restart, the U.S. Navy is expected to fall short of its requirement for 94 missile-defense-capable destroyer and cruiser platforms starting in FY 2025 and continuing past the end of the 30-year planning window. While this is a new requirement as of 2011, and the U.S. Navy has never had so many large missile-armed surface combatants, the relative success of the Aegis ballistic missile defense system has shifted this national security requirement onto the U.S. Navy. The shortfall will arise as older platforms that have been refitted to be missile-defense-capable (particularly the cruisers) are retired in bulk before new destroyers are planned to be built.^[57]

The U.S. Navy was considering extending the acquisition of Arleigh Burke-class destroyers into the 2040s, according to revised procurement tables sent to Congress, which have the U.S. Navy procuring Flight IV ships from 2032 through 2041.^[58] This was canceled to cover the cost of the Ohio Replacement Submarine, with the air defense commander role retained on one cruiser per carrier battle group.^[59]

Future replacement[edit]

USS Michael Murphy (DDG-112) was originally intended to be the last of the Arleigh Burke class. However, with reduction of the Zumwalt-class production, the U.S. Navy requested new DDG-51-class ships.^[60] Long-lead materials contracts were awarded to Northrop Grumman in December 2009 for DDG-113 and in April 2010 for DDG-114.^[61] General Dynamics received a long-lead materials contract for DDG-115 in February 2010.^[62][63] It is anticipated that in FY2012 or FY2013, the U.S. Navy will commence detailed work for a Flight III design and request 24 ships to be built from 2016 to 2031.^[64] In May 2013, a total of 76 Burke-class ships were planned.^[65] The Flight III variant is in the design phase as of 2013. In June 2013, the U.S. Navy awarded $6.2 billion in destroyer contracts.^[66] Up to 42 Flight III ships may be procured by the U.S. Navy with the first ship entering service in 2023.^[67]

In April 2014 the U.S. Navy began the early stages of developing a new destroyer to replace the Arleigh Burke-class called the “Future Surface Combatant”. The new class is expected to enter service in the early 2030s and initially serve alongside the 22 Flight III DDGs. No hull design or shape has been speculated yet, although the destroyer class will incorporate emerging technologies like lasers, on-board power-generation systems, increased automation, and next-generation weapons, sensors, and electronics. They will leverage technologies in use on other platforms such as the Zumwalt-class destroyer, Littoral Combat Ship, and Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carriers.^[68]

The Future Surface Combatant may place importance on the Zumwalt-class destroyer’s electric drive system that propels the ship while generating 58 megawatts of on-board electrical power, levels required to operate future directed energy weapons. Laser weapon systems are likely to become more prominent to engage threats without using missiles that could potentially cost more than the target it is engaging. Less costly weapon systems may help keep the destroyer class from becoming too expensive. Initial requirements for the Future Surface Combatant will emphasize lethality and survivability, as well as being able to continue to protect aircraft carriers. The ships also have to be modular to allow for inexpensive upgrades of weaponry, electronics, computing, and sensors over time as threats evolve.^[68]

Operational history[edit]

Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Cole was damaged on 12 October 2000 in Aden, Yemen while docked, by an attack in which an apparently shaped charge of 200–300 kg in a boat was placed against the hull and detonated by suicide bombers, killing 17 crew members. The ship was repaired, and returned to duty in 2001.

In October 2011 it was announced that four Arleigh Burke-class destroyers would be forward-deployed in Europe to support the NATO missile defence system. The ships, to be based at Naval Station Rota, Spain, were named in February 2012, as Ross, Donald Cook, Porter, and Carney.^[69] By reducing travel times to station, this forward deployment will allow for six other destroyers to be shifted from the Atlantic in support of the Pivot to East Asia.^[70] Russia has threatened to quit the New START treaty over this deployment, calling it a threat to their nuclear deterrent.^[71]

Contractors[edit]

• Builders: 34 units constructed by General Dynamics, Bath Iron Works Division, and 28 by Huntington Ingalls Industries (formerly Northrop Grumman Ship Systems), Ingalls Shipbuilding
• AN/SPY-1 radar and combat system integrator: Lockheed Martin

Ships in class[edit]

Name	Number	Builder	Launched	Commissioned	Home port	Status
Flight I
Arleigh Burke	DDG-51	Bath Iron Works	16 September 1989	4 July 1991	Norfolk, Virginia	Active
Barry	DDG-52	Ingalls Shipbuilding	8 June 1991	12 December 1992	Yokosuka, Japan	Active
John Paul Jones	DDG-53	Bath Iron Works	26 October 1991	18 December 1993	Pearl Harbor, Hawaii	Active
Curtis Wilbur	DDG-54	Bath Iron Works	16 May 1992	19 March 1994	Yokosuka, Japan	Active
Stout	DDG-55	Ingalls Shipbuilding	16 October 1992	13 August 1994	Norfolk, Virginia	Active
John S. McCain	DDG-56	Bath Iron Works	26 September 1992	2 July 1994	Yokosuka, Japan	Active
Mitscher	DDG-57	Ingalls Shipbuilding	7 May 1993	10 December 1994	Norfolk, Virginia	Active
Laboon	DDG-58	Bath Iron Works	20 February 1993	18 March 1995	Norfolk, Virginia	Active
Russell	DDG-59	Ingalls Shipbuilding	20 October 1993	20 May 1995	San Diego, California	Active
Paul Hamilton	DDG-60	Bath Iron Works	24 July 1993	27 May 1995	San Diego, California	Active
Ramage	DDG-61	Ingalls Shipbuilding	11 February 1994	22 July 1995	Norfolk, Virginia	Active
Fitzgerald	DDG-62	Bath Iron Works	29 January 1994	14 October 1995	Yokosuka, Japan	Heading for repairs
Stethem	DDG-63	Ingalls Shipbuilding	17 July 1994	21 October 1995	Yokosuka, Japan	Active
Carney	DDG-64	Bath Iron Works	23 July 1994	13 April 1996	Rota, Spain	Active
Benfold	DDG-65	Ingalls Shipbuilding	9 November 1994	30 March 1996	Yokosuka, Japan	Active
Gonzalez	DDG-66	Bath Iron Works	18 February 1995	12 October 1996	Norfolk, Virginia	Active
Cole	DDG-67	Ingalls Shipbuilding	10 February 1995	8 June 1996	Norfolk, Virginia	Active
The Sullivans	DDG-68	Bath Iron Works	12 August 1995	19 April 1997	Mayport, Florida	Active
Milius	DDG-69	Ingalls Shipbuilding	1 August 1995	23 November 1996	San Diego, California	Active
Hopper	DDG-70	Bath Iron Works	6 January 1996	6 September 1997	Pearl Harbor, Hawaii	Active
Ross	DDG-71	Ingalls Shipbuilding	22 March 1996	28 June 1997	Rota, Spain	Active
Flight II
Mahan	DDG-72	Bath Iron Works	29 June 1996	14 February 1998	Norfolk, Virginia	Active
Decatur	DDG-73	Bath Iron Works	10 November 1996	29 August 1998	San Diego, California	Active
McFaul	DDG-74	Ingalls Shipbuilding	18 January 1997	25 April 1998	Norfolk, Virginia	Active
Donald Cook	DDG-75	Bath Iron Works	3 May 1997	4 December 1998	Rota, Spain	Active
Higgins	DDG-76	Bath Iron Works	4 October 1997	24 April 1999	San Diego, California	Active
O’Kane	DDG-77	Bath Iron Works	28 March 1998	23 October 1999	Pearl Harbor, Hawaii	Active
Porter	DDG-78	Ingalls Shipbuilding	12 November 1997	20 March 1999	Rota, Spain	Active
Flight IIA: 5″/54 variant
Oscar Austin	DDG-79	Bath Iron Works	7 November 1998	19 August 2000	Norfolk, Virginia	Active
Roosevelt	DDG-80	Ingalls Shipbuilding	10 January 1999	14 October 2000	Mayport, Florida	Active
Flight IIA: 5″/62 variant
Winston S. Churchill	DDG-81	Bath Iron Works	17 April 1999	10 March 2001	Norfolk, Virginia	Active
Lassen	DDG-82	Ingalls Shipbuilding	16 October 1999	21 April 2001	Mayport, Florida	Active
Howard	DDG-83	Bath Iron Works	20 November 1999	20 October 2001	San Diego, California	Active
Bulkeley	DDG-84	Ingalls Shipbuilding	21 June 2000	8 December 2001	Norfolk, Virginia	Active
Flight IIA: 5″/62, one 20mm CIWS variant[29]
McCampbell	DDG-85	Bath Iron Works	2 July 2000	17 August 2002	Yokosuka, Japan	Active
Shoup	DDG-86	Ingalls Shipbuilding	22 November 2000	22 June 2002	Everett, Washington	Active
Mason	DDG-87	Bath Iron Works	23 June 2001	12 April 2003	Norfolk, Virginia	Active
Preble	DDG-88	Ingalls Shipbuilding	1 June 2001	9 November 2002	Pearl Harbor, Hawaii	Active
Mustin	DDG-89	Ingalls Shipbuilding	12 December 2001	26 July 2003	Yokosuka, Japan	Active
Chafee	DDG-90	Bath Iron Works	2 November 2002	18 October 2003	Pearl Harbor, Hawaii	Active
Pinckney	DDG-91	Ingalls Shipbuilding	26 June 2002	29 May 2004	San Diego, California	Active
Momsen	DDG-92	Bath Iron Works	19 July 2003	28 August 2004	Everett, Washington	Active
Chung-Hoon	DDG-93	Ingalls Shipbuilding	15 December 2002	18 September 2004	Pearl Harbor, Hawaii	Active
Nitze	DDG-94	Bath Iron Works	3 April 2004	5 March 2005	Norfolk, Virginia	Active
James E. Williams	DDG-95	Ingalls Shipbuilding	25 June 2003	11 December 2004	Norfolk, Virginia	Active
Bainbridge	DDG-96	Bath Iron Works	13 November 2004	12 November 2005	Norfolk, Virginia	Active
Halsey	DDG-97	Ingalls Shipbuilding	9 January 2004	30 July 2005	Pearl Harbor, Hawaii	Active
Forrest Sherman	DDG-98	Ingalls Shipbuilding	2 October 2004	28 January 2006	Norfolk, Virginia	Active
Farragut	DDG-99	Bath Iron Works	23 July 2005	10 June 2006	Mayport, Florida	Active
Kidd	DDG-100	Ingalls Shipbuilding	22 January 2005	9 June 2007	Everett, Washington	Active
Gridley	DDG-101	Bath Iron Works	28 December 2005	10 February 2007	Everett, Washington	Active
Sampson	DDG-102	Bath Iron Works	16 September 2006	3 November 2007	Everett, Washington	Active
Truxtun	DDG-103	Ingalls Shipbuilding	2 June 2007	25 April 2009	Norfolk, Virginia	Active
Sterett	DDG-104	Bath Iron Works	19 May 2007	9 August 2008	San Diego, California	Active
Dewey	DDG-105	Ingalls Shipbuilding	26 January 2008	6 March 2010	San Diego, California	Active
Stockdale	DDG-106	Bath Iron Works	10 May 2008	18 April 2009	San Diego, California	Active
Gravely	DDG-107	Ingalls Shipbuilding	30 March 2009	20 November 2010	Norfolk, Virginia	Active
Wayne E. Meyer	DDG-108	Bath Iron Works	18 October 2008	10 October 2009	San Diego, California	Active
Jason Dunham	DDG-109	Bath Iron Works	1 August 2009	13 November 2010	Norfolk, Virginia	Active
William P. Lawrence	DDG-110	Ingalls Shipbuilding	15 December 2009	4 June 2011	San Diego, California	Active
Spruance	DDG-111	Bath Iron Works	6 June 2010	1 October 2011	San Diego, California	Active
Michael Murphy	DDG-112	Bath Iron Works	7 May 2011	6 October 2012	Pearl Harbor, Hawaii	Active
Flight IIA: Restart
John Finn	DDG-113	Ingalls Shipbuilding	28 March 2015[72]	scheduled 15 July 2017[73]		Delivered[74]
Ralph Johnson	DDG-114	Ingalls Shipbuilding	12 December 2015	scheduled in 2017[75][76]		Launched[77]
Rafael Peralta	DDG-115	Bath Iron Works	1 November 2015[78]	scheduled in 29 July 2017[79][80]		Delivered[81][82][80]
Flight IIA: Technology Insertion
Thomas Hudner	DDG-116	Bath Iron Works	23 April 2017	scheduled in 2018		Launched[83]
Paul Ignatius	DDG-117	Ingalls Shipbuilding	12 November 2016	scheduled in 2018		Launched[84]
Daniel Inouye	DDG-118	Bath Iron Works				Keel Laid[85]
Delbert D. Black	DDG-119	Ingalls Shipbuilding		scheduled in 2018[86]		Keel Laid[87]
Carl M. Levin[88]	DDG-120	Bath Iron Works				Contract awarded (MYP)
Frank E. Petersen Jr.[89]	DDG-121	Ingalls Shipbuilding		scheduled in 2020[90]		Keel Laid[91]
John Basilone[92]	DDG-122	Bath Iron Works		scheduled in 2022		Contract awarded (MYP)
Lenah H. Sutcliffe Higbee[93]	DDG-123	Ingalls Shipbuilding				Keel Laid[94]
Flight III
Harvey C. Barnum Jr.[88]	DDG-124	Bath Iron Works				Contract awarded (MYP)
Jack H. Lucas[95]	DDG-125	Ingalls Shipbuilding				Contract awarded (MYP)
Louis H. Wilson Jr.[95]	DDG-126	Bath Iron Works				Contract awarded (MYP)